First published on LinkedIn April 14, 2015
I recently ran a development workshop on Extra-Dependent Teams with an NHS Trust. A deputy HR director was taking part and was fascinated by my approach to performance management conversations with Extra-Dependent Teams. To quote him, he said,
"That's a totally obvious thing to do. Yet I've never thought of doing it before!"
That's what I love about Extra-Dependent Teams: they provide easy answers to complex organisational issues.
So what is the “obvious thing to do”? Well, before I share the answer, let’s understand how most performance conversations happen (and this isn’t limited to the NHS by any means) by way of an example of an HR Business Partner; but it could equally be a doctor, an engineer, a sales rep, etc.
An HR Business Partner is managed by an HR Director. The Director is responsible for assessing the HRBP’s performance and does so through regular 2-way conversations with the HRBP. However, because the HRBP partners for a senior manager running another business elsewhere in the organisation the Director rarely witnesses the work, results or behaviour of the HRBP. With this vacuum of knowledge, the Director prepares for the conversations by seeking feedback from the senior manager about the HRBP, how well they work and what they think. Armed with this information they then discuss performance with the HRBP.
Now, if everything is going swimmingly well the discussion is simple. Perhaps there’s some coaching going on, some constructive reflection and challenging objective setting. When it comes to giving performance feedback – an important value adding element of a performance conversation – the Director relies on 3rd party commentary (with examples if the feedback is rich or just opinion if feedback is poor). If this feedback is important to either the Director or the HRBP, the fact that it comes from a 3rd party significantly erodes its impact and therefore its ability to influence performance. As a result performance conversations often don’t tackle the issues that need to be tackled.
So what to do instead? Rather than 1 conversation about 1 person’s performance, it requires 3 conversations involving 3 people to address performance at individual, team and organisational levels. The 3 conversations are:
With traditional 2-way performance conversations, this 3rd conversation only tends to happen as a feedback collection process with the HRBP in mind. With the 3-way performance conversations of Extra-Dependent Teams, it is a legitimate conversation between the Director and the senior manager about performance that both are responsible for.
It was this 3rd conversation that the deputy Director of HR declared as, “a totally obvious thing to do”. But also recognised how uniquely different it was as a way of managing performance within complex matrix organisations and so was humble enough to say, “Yet I’ve never thought of doing it before!”
Extra-Dependent Teams provide many simple answers to recurring organisational problems.
Comment on this article or give us feedback in our Community